Got you covered @skullmeat
Check your profile to update last.fm
Forums, categories, and other ideas
Re: Forums, categories, and other ideas
I can see GOG field, but not Steam one. :confused:
Can't Speak English :confused:
Re: Forums, categories, and other ideas
Oops... display was not checked. It's fixed along with several others.
Re: Forums, categories, and other ideas
I'm thinking about it a little bit.ward wrote: Jan 29th, '26, 15:01 Then we need to figure out console gaming... do we have a separate forum for each console? Do we break it down by era (8bit, 16bit, 32bit, etc.)?
- We can stay like it right now, but we need decide border between "retro" and "modern".
- Separate like you said 8bit, 16bit, 32bit, 64bit and all other.
- Or what I recommend, separate it by generations:
- 1st generation (1972–1983)
- 2nd generation (1976–1992)
- 3rd generation (1983–2003)
- 4th generation (1987–2003)
- 5th generation (1993–2005)
- 6th generation (1998–2013)
- 7th generation (2005–2017)
- 8th generation (2012–present)
- 9th generation (2020–present)
Can't Speak English :confused:
- Virtua Wug
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Feb 15th, '26, 03:37
- Pronouns: She/They
- Location: City Rooftop Helipad
Re: Forums, categories, and other ideas
You could possibly have categories for games for each decade instead of for each generation, since it can sometimes be difficult to determine what generation a certain game or console belongs to.
For me, I consider a "retro" game to be anything released on a console which is at least 25 years old. For PC games, I think 20 years old or older is a good cutoff.
For me, I consider a "retro" game to be anything released on a console which is at least 25 years old. For PC games, I think 20 years old or older is a good cutoff.
Re: Forums, categories, and other ideas
@Virtua Wug I've suggested it mostly because it decided by someone and everyone are agreed on that classification. It's not perfect but working.
In my opinion separate just by "retro" and "modern" not very good because every person has their own opinion about "retro" and "modern". We don't need flame wars here, do we?
Maybe it's best to stick to companies instead of decades? Like make forums for big three "Microsoft consoles", "Nintendo consoles", "Sony consoles" and "Other consoles". In this case we have small amount of forums and it's easy to decide where to post. :wink:
And I have question, where to post about DOOM, for example? Do I need create threads for every platform on what I play, like "[ DOS] DOOM", "[PS1] DOOM", etc. Or it preferable to create one thread "DOOM" and chat about all versions?
In my opinion separate just by "retro" and "modern" not very good because every person has their own opinion about "retro" and "modern". We don't need flame wars here, do we?
Maybe it's best to stick to companies instead of decades? Like make forums for big three "Microsoft consoles", "Nintendo consoles", "Sony consoles" and "Other consoles". In this case we have small amount of forums and it's easy to decide where to post. :wink:
And I have question, where to post about DOOM, for example? Do I need create threads for every platform on what I play, like "[ DOS] DOOM", "[PS1] DOOM", etc. Or it preferable to create one thread "DOOM" and chat about all versions?
Can't Speak English :confused:
Re: Forums, categories, and other ideas
Hmm... maybe we should spy on console forums to see how they break it down and then take some ideas from them, lol...
My issue with year-based generation categorizations is (I think) a lot of us will constantly have to look up stuff to see, "wait, when was 32X a thing?" I'd want something that clearly lists the systems. Rather than years, focus on the bits... The damn bits... we remember that marketing stuff and can easily recall for most systems. I guess I will also list the systems in the forum description to make it easier.
(I do think organizing things companies is more logical for many as well, but it's also weird to organize the PC and console sections with different criteria imo).
So, I'd like to keep things organized by era to match the PC gaming section... here's what I think:
My issue with year-based generation categorizations is (I think) a lot of us will constantly have to look up stuff to see, "wait, when was 32X a thing?" I'd want something that clearly lists the systems. Rather than years, focus on the bits... The damn bits... we remember that marketing stuff and can easily recall for most systems. I guess I will also list the systems in the forum description to make it easier.
(I do think organizing things companies is more logical for many as well, but it's also weird to organize the PC and console sections with different criteria imo).
So, I'd like to keep things organized by era to match the PC gaming section... here's what I think:
- 8-bit & 16-bit Era (1980–1993)
Atari 2600, 5200, 7800
Sega Master System
NES
SNES
Sega Genesis
TurboGrafx-16
Neo-Geo - 32-bit & 64-bit Era (1993–2000)
Jaguar
PlayStation
Nintendo 64
3DO
Sega Saturn
Dreamcast - 128-bit/DVD Era(2000–2012)
PlayStation 2
Xbox
GameCube
Xbox 360
PlayStation 3
Nintendo Wii
Wii U - Modern Console Era (2013–Present)
PS4/5
Switch
Xbox One - Emulation
- Linux
- Mac
- Windows
Re: Forums, categories, and other ideas
I think this is the way to go. It's the best way to categorize things in a way that minimizes clutter.ward wrote: Feb 25th, '26, 15:42I think we probably need software categories too... well, mainly for OSes since I'm sure we will get Linux talk and there's no category. However, I don't really want to break down the software by era... I think gaming is somewhat more generational... and I don't expect as much software/os talk. So, I was thinking just:
- 8-bit & 16-bit Era (1980–1993)
Atari 2600, 5200, 7800
Sega Master System
NES
SNES
Sega Genesis
TurboGrafx-16
Neo-Geo- 32-bit & 64-bit Era (1993–2000)
Jaguar
PlayStation
Nintendo 64
3DO
Sega Saturn
Dreamcast- 128-bit/DVD Era(2000–2012)
PlayStation 2
Xbox
GameCube
Xbox 360
PlayStation 3
Nintendo Wii
Wii U- Modern Console Era (2013–Present)
PS4/5
Switch
Xbox One- Emulation
- Linux
- Mac
- Windows